Send Cancel. Check system status. Toggle navigation Menu.
Name of resource. Problem URL.
Describe the connection issue. SearchWorks Catalog Stanford Libraries.
Complete writings : letterbook, dialogue on Adam and Eve, orations. Responsibility Isotta Nogarola ; edited and translated by Margaret L. King and Diana Robin. This volume presents English translations of all of Nogarola's extant works and highlights just how daring and original her convictions were. In her letters and orations, Nogarola elegantly synthesized Greco-Roman thought with biblical teachings. And striding across the stage in public, she lectured the Veronese citizenry on everything from history and religion to politics and morality.
But the most influential of Nogarola's works was a performance piece, Dialogue on Adam and Eve , in which she discussed the relative sinfulness of Adam and Eve—thereby opening up a centuries-long debate in Europe on gender and the nature of woman and establishing herself as an important figure in Western intellectual history.
This book will be a must read for teachers and students of Women's Studies as well as of Renaissance literature and history. Diana Robin is a professor emerita of classics at the University of New Mexico. Title: Complete Writings: Letterbook, Dialogue on Book Description University of Chicago Press, Condition: Good. Pasadena's finest new and used bookstore since Seller Inventory mon More information about this seller Contact this seller.
Add to Basket. Condition: GOOD. Has little wear to the cover and pages. Contains some markings such as highlighting and writing. Supplemental materials are not guaranteed with any used book purchases. Connecting readers with great books since Customer service is our top priority!. Book Description University of Chicago Press. Condition: Very Good. That hierarchy did not rule out the companionship of husband and wife, whose cooperation was necessary for the welfare of children and the preservation of property.
Such mutuality supported male preeminence. The setting for this proposal is the imaginary and ideal Republic that Plato sketches in a dialogue of that name. Here, for a privileged elite capable of leading wisely, all distinctions of class and wealth dissolve, as, consequently, do those of gender. Without households or property, as Plato constructs his ideal society, there is no need for the subordination of women. Women may therefore be educated to the same level as men to assume leadership. In real societies, the subordination of women remained the norm and the prescription. The views of women inherited from the Greek philosophical tradition became the basis for medieval thought.
In the thirteenth century, 2. Aristotle, Generation of Animals 2. Roman law, like Greek philosophy, underlay medieval thought and shaped medieval society. The ancient belief that adult property-owning men should administer households and make decisions affecting the community at large is the very fulcrum of Roman law. About B. It was later elaborated by professional jurists whose activity increased in the imperial era, when much new legislation was passed, especially on issues affecting family and inheritance.
That Corpus, read and commented on by medieval scholars from the eleventh century on, inspired the legal systems of most of the cities and kingdoms of Europe.
Laws regarding dowries, divorce, and inheritance pertain primarily to women. Since those laws aimed to maintain and preserve property, the women concerned were those from the property-owning minority. Their subordination to male family members points to the even greater subordination of lower-class and slave women, about whom the laws speak little. The paterfamilias had absolute power—including the power, rarely exercised, of life or death—over his wife, his children, and his slaves, as much as his cattle.
But females could never be emancipated; instead, they passed from the authority of their father to that of a husband or, if widowed or orphaned while still unmarried, to a guardian or tutor. He could divorce her on grounds of adultery, drinking wine, or stealing from the household, but she could not divorce him. When her husband died, the household property passed not to her but to his male heirs.
And when her father died, she had no claim to any family inheritance, which was directed to her brothers or more remote male relatives. The effect of these laws was to exclude women from civil society, itself based on property ownership. Women rarely married according to the traditional form. She could also bequeath property to her own children and divorce her husband, just as he could divorce her. Despite this greater freedom, women still suffered enormous disability under Roman law.
Moreover, although she could bequeath her property to her children, she could not establish a line of succession in doing so. Moreover, women could play no public role. Women had only a private existence and no public personality. The Hebrew Bible and the Christian New Testament authorized later writers to limit women to the realm of the family and to burden them with the guilt of original sin. Christian theologians relied principally on Genesis 2 for their understanding of the relation between man and woman, interpreting the creation of Eve from Adam as proof of her subordination to him.
As read by Christian theologians from Tertullian to Thomas Aquinas, the narrative made Eve responsible for the Fall and its consequences. She instigated the act; she deceived her husband; she suffered the greater punishment. Her disobedience made it necessary for Jesus to be incarnated and to die on the cross.
From the pulpit, moralists and preachers for centuries conveyed to women the guilt that they bore for original sin. The Epistles offered advice to early Christians on building communities of the faithful. Among the matters to be regulated was the place of women.
These passages from the New Testament became the arsenal employed by theologians of the early church to transmit negative attitudes toward women to medieval Christian culture—above all, Tertullian On the Apparel of Women , Jerome Against Jovinian , and Augustine The Literal Meaning of Genesis. The philosophical, legal, and religious traditions born in antiquity formed the basis of the medieval intellectual synthesis wrought by trained thinkers, mostly clerics, writing in Latin and based largely in universities.
Medieval stories, poems, and epics also portrayed women negatively—as lustful and deceitful—while praising good housekeepers and loyal wives as replicas of the Virgin Mary or the female saints and martyrs. It was always adulterous.
From the conventions of courtly love derive modern Western notions of romantic love. The tradition has had an impact disproportionate to its size, for it affected only a tiny elite, and very few women.
N6 A25 Stock Image. The content of the Open Access version may differ from that of the licensed version. Seller's Description: New. Shop finder Help Oxfam GB.
Guillaume de Lorris composed the initial four thousand verses about , and Jean de Meun added about seventeen thousand verses—more than four times the original—about The fragment composed by Guillaume de Lorris stands squarely in the tradition of courtly love. He longs to pick one rose, but the thorns prevent his doing so, even as he is wounded by arrows from the god of love, whose commands he agrees to obey.
The longer part of the Romance by Jean de Meun also describes a dream. But here allegorical characters give long didactic speeches, providing a social satire on a variety of themes, some pertaining to women.
agendapop.cl/wp-content/topspy/tozuw-localizar-un-celular.php Love is an anxious and tormented state, the poem explains: women are greedy and manipulative, marriage is miserable, beautiful women are lustful, ugly ones cease to please, and a chaste woman is as rare as a black swan.